The Michigan Supreme Court recently issued Administrative Order No. 2020-23, adopting twelve Principles of Professionalism for both lawyers and judges. The Principles of Professionalism were the product of the Professionalism Workgroup that was formed during Jennifer Grieco’s tenure as President of the State Bar of Michigan. The Workgroup, chaired by SBM Past-President Ed...
Authored By: Jennifer Grieco and Stephen McKenney We have all seen it. We have all, probably, done it. We are answering a complaint on behalf of our client, and we need to plead affirmative defenses. We are all keenly aware of the requirement in MCR 2.111(F) that a “defense not asserted in the responsive pleading or by motion as provided in these rules is...
Authored By: Kenneth Neuman and Stephen McKenney One of the common types of restrictive covenants that Michigan courts have held are enforceable in employment (and other) contracts are so-called “non-solicitation” covenants. Typically, non-solicitation covenants prohibit an employee (or shareholder, member, director) of a company from soliciting any of the company’s customers (or...
Authored By: Matthew Smith Garnishments are common and cost-effective means for judgment creditors to collect monies held by a third-party garnishee. Upon receipt of a writ of garnishment, the garnishee must prepare a garnishee disclosure and take care to follow the procedures set forth in MCR 3.101. This may require withholding some or all of the money due to the judgment...
Authored By: Jennifer A. Cupples We are all familiar with Michigan Court Rule 2.312(A) which allows a party to serve on another party a written request for the admission of truth of a matter within the scope of MCR 2.302(B) as it relates to statements or opinions of fact or the application of law to fact, including the genuineness of documents. The requests are usually...
The Michigan Court of Appeals recently addressed, in a published opinion, the issue of the attorney-client privilege and how it applies to communications between an attorney and client over e-mail. In Stavale v. Stavale, Docket No. 349472 (Mich. Ct. App. June 11, 2020), the Court of Appeals discussed the issue of whether the privilege applies when the client uses an employer-provided e-mail...
Michigan litigators commonly rely on federal authority to interpret and enforce blanket orders and requirements contracts under Article 2 of Michigan’s Uniform Commercial Code. This is in part due to more plentiful and detailed analyses of blanket orders and requirements contracts in the federal case law, and a countervailing paucity of Michigan appellate decisions on these subjects. That...
In a previous post we discussed the Michigan Court of Appeals decision allowing a cause of action to proceed against an expert witness alleging professional malpractice. In Estate of Voutsaras v. Bender, 326 Mich. App. 667 the Michigan Court of Appeals held that the doctrine of witness immunity did not shield a lawyer, serving as an expert witness, from a claim for professional...
When the 21st century started on January 1, 2001, traditional legal practice included: carbon copy summonses, case stickers, law libraries, Loislaw, a manual bates-stamp device, paper heavy depositions and trial, and trials before a live jury. Since that time, technology has allowed for e-summonses, video courtrooms, electronic bates stamping, video depositions, e-filing and service,...
As we discussed in an earlier post, one of the areas of dispute we anticipate will emerge as activities resume following the Coronavirus pandemic will center on whether business interruption insurance policies will cover losses stemming from the pandemic and ensuing Stay Home, Stay Safe Order. One of the specific issues we anticipate is whether coverage is triggered only by governmental...
